Quản lý nguồn nhân lực có trách nhiệm xã hội, vốn trí tuệ và hiệu quả đổi mới của các doanh nghiệp vừa và nhỏ tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này phân tích mối quan hệ giữa quản trị nguồn nhân lực có trách nhiệm xã hội (SRHRM), Vốn trí tuệ (IC) và Hiệu quả đổi mới (IP) trong các doanh nghiệp vừa và nhỏ (SMEs) tại Việt Nam, dựa trên lý thuyết nguồn lực và lý thuyết Vốn trí tuệ. Nhóm tác giả xây dựng mô hình gồm bảy giả thuyết nhằm kiểm định vai trò trung gian của ba thành phần IC: vốn con người, vốn cấu trúc và vốn quan hệ. Dữ liệu khảo sát từ 318 nhân sự tại TP.HCM được xử lý bằng phương pháp mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính (SEM). Kết quả cho thấy SRHRM ảnh hưởng tích cực đến các thành phần IC và hiệu quả đổi mới, trong đó vốn con người và vốn quan hệ có tác động đáng kể đến IP, còn vốn cấu trúc không có ảnh hưởng rõ rệt. Nghiên cứu đề xuất tích hợp chiến lược nhân sự với đổi mới, đồng thời lưu ý thận trọng khi đầu tư vào vốn cấu trúc nếu thiếu yếu tố sáng tạo.
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between Socially Responsible Human Resource Management (SRHRM), Intellectual Capital (IC), and Innovation Performance (IP) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam, drawing upon the Resource-Based View and Intellectual Capital Theory. The authors developed a model comprising seven hypotheses to examine the mediating roles of three IC components: human capital, structural capital, and relational capital. Survey data collected from 318 employees in Ho Chi Minh City were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results reveal that SRHRM positively influences IC components and innovation performance. Among the IC dimensions, human capital and relational capital significantly impact innovation performance, while structural capital shows no clear effect. The study recommends integrating HR strategies with innovation efforts and cautions against investing heavily in structural capital without a strong creative foundation.
Từ khóa
Quản lý nguồn nhân lực; Vốn trí tuệ; Vốn xã hội; Hiệu quả đổi mới
Chi tiết bài viết
Lĩnh vực kinh tế (JEL Codes)
M21 - Business Economics - Business Economics
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Barrena-Martínez, J., López-Fernández, M., & Romero-Fernández, P. M. (2017). Socially responsible human resource policies and practices: Academic and professional validation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 55–61.
Belmonte da Silva, R., López-Fernández, M., & Romero-Fernández, P. M. (2021). Relational capital and innovation capability in Latin American public organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(7), 789–805.
Chiganze, C., & Sağsan, M. (2022). Relationship between human capital, innovation capability and job performance in academic libraries. Libri, 72(2), 123–135.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. HarperBusiness.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
González, J., Martínez, M., & Pérez, L. (2021). Structural capital and innovation in the public sector: A study of Spanish municipalities. Public Management Review, 23(5), 678–695.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Heikkinen, H., Lämsä, A.-M., & Mäkelä, M. (2021). The paradox of socially responsible HRM: A case study. Employee Relations, 43(6), 1234–1250.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.
Inkinen, H. (2015). Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 518–565.
Inkinen, H. (2021). Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 1–30.
Inkinen, H., Kianto, A., & Vanhala, M. (2015). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance in Finland. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(4), 432–455.
Kianto, A., Sáenz, J., & Aramburu, N. (2017). Knowledge-based HRM practices, intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 81, 11–20.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Pimenta, C., Silva, M., & Costa, R. (2023). Socially responsible human resource management and relational capital: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 150, 456–468.
Shaaban, S. (2023). The dark side of socially responsible HRM: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 987–1002.
Shen, J., & Benson, J. (2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1723–1746.
Shen, J., & Ji, Y. (2015). The effect of socially responsible human resource management on employees' organizational citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of organizational identification. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(7), 936–955.
Shen, J., & Zhang, H. (2017). Socially responsible HRM and employee support for external CSR: Roles of CSR climate and perceived CSR toward employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 875–888.
Shen, J., & Zhang, H. (2017). Socially responsible human resource management and employee support for external CSR: Roles of organizational CSR climate and perceived CSR directed toward employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 875–888.
Shrestha, S., & Prajapati, S. (2024). Impact of HRM practices on OCB in Nepalese financial institutions. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(1), 45–60.
Skrodzka, I. (2025). Impact of human capital on innovation performance in EU economies. Statistics in Transition New Series, 26(1), 135–154.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
Subramony, M., Segers, J., Chadwick, C., & Shyamsunder, A. (2018). Leadership development practice bundles and organizational performance: The mediating role of human capital and social capital. Journal of Business Research, 83, 120–129.
Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), 181–197.
Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725.
Wang, Z., & Lee, J. (2023). The impact of structural and relational capital on innovation performance: Evidence from Taiwanese SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 17(2), 123–140.
Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899–8908.
Wang, Z., Wang, N., & Liang, H. (2021). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and innovation: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120734.
Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721.
Youndt, M. A., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Human resource configurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16(3), 337–360.